Domi Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 OK, OK, we are debating a new approach to romance conflicts for the contenderes for PC's heart: challenge-based, when NPCs will have to outdo each-other to win PC's approval in a serie of challenges. What we are debating right now is *who* should initiate the challenege sequence: PC or NPCs? PC-driven: PRO: It's PC's call if she wants to see the challenges or not; It will give the occasion the flavour of a game where all parties are equal participants CONTRA: It will make some players to miss out on challenges NPC-driven: PRO: Evereyone will see at least the first challenges; has the same attraction of NPCs fighting over PC in 'classical' conflicts CONTRA: PC is a passive observer Link to comment
jester Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 I think the conflict should be brewing and observable by the PC (read a little bit of NPC fighting) then she or he decides the course of this. As much as I liked the Kelsey Anomen exchange I must say that it did not suit all charcters I have played them with. Some would have made it clear that they would prefer an outright challenge here and there to constant nagging from the back seats. PC driven would also mean more work to adapt to the playing styles while NPC driven only has to adapt to the two NPCs fighting IMO. Link to comment
Fallen_Demon Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 Idealy the possibility of the pc choosing for it to happen before, but it happening anyway, but I suppose that might be a bit much work. Link to comment
BigRob Posted December 16, 2004 Share Posted December 16, 2004 I like the idea of a mixed conflict. The NPCs should be mostly driving it, since it's their disagreement, but CHARNAME should be able to take a hand in it if desired. Link to comment
Sillara of the Tamari Posted December 18, 2004 Share Posted December 18, 2004 I like the idea that NPCs have the conflict. Firstly, I like being fought over. Secondly, as BigRob put it, it is their disagreement. I would like, if possible, for the PC to be able to step in and put an end to the fighting--but only by choosing one contender or the other. I think that is more realistic than just saying, "okay, quit fighting" without removing the reason for the conflict. Sillara Link to comment
Domi Posted December 18, 2004 Author Share Posted December 18, 2004 Well, I would like to emphasise that there is NO physical fighting between NPCs, in neither male nor female NPC romance conflict. I think the compromise now stands on having 1 or 2 dialogues between NPCs showing growing tensions between Ajantis and Coran. Then PC gets to either encourage the males by setting the playful challenge (one of 4) or deciding to herself that she likes one more than the other (she gets the same options after each challenge). Every rest time thereafter, she will be encouraged to either chose or set next challenge. Once she had decided, the timer will shut down the 'loser's' romance in about 1 hour of playing time. It will be assumed that delicate PC managed to send enough signals to the guy that it's all over. Obviously, after all 4 challeneges played out or if PC consumates one of the relationships there will be no choice to continue the parallel romances. Link to comment
Guest Guest_guest Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 What about a new woman NPC that can challenge the PC romance conflict. Lets say that im a woman PC and I like Anomen. OK this New NPC Char. wants him too. Ok I know why take her in the party right but why not have a challenge to win there love for once instead of them always getting to fight over us. I love challenges, I just would like to see the pc have to fight for what she wants, she does all this stuff for Imoen. The has to be another woman on the sword coast that would want Anomens or Kelseys love too. I think the bhaal spawn would be protective of what is hers,and wouldn't want to just win there love without a challenge. Link to comment
Domi Posted December 22, 2004 Author Share Posted December 22, 2004 In both CG and CN Coran there is a few romantic conflicts with a non-party NPCs (a couple of unnamed ones and of course Brielbara); PC can act rather violently or forgiving or whatever - lots and lots of choices, including poisoning Coran out of jelousy. While there is no romantic conflict involved, Coran will chose Safana over PC and romance her (and flirt with every other woman in sight, which becomes particulary bad if he is pushed into becoming CN) Link to comment
Domi Posted December 22, 2004 Author Share Posted December 22, 2004 O, yes, just remebered.. in male PC romance in Dynaheir's case Edwin will do his best to break the relationship appart and Minsc is acting well... like Minsc usually acts toward Dynaheir - protective! So watch out for unique Rashemi insights and butt kicking, <CHARNAME> if you upset glorious Dynaheir! Link to comment
Volly Posted January 1, 2005 Share Posted January 1, 2005 Well, I would like to emphasise that there is NO physical fighting between NPCs, in neither male nor female NPC romance conflict. Well... there should be! Give em a couple o pointy sticks and let em go at it! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.