Incompatibility with Bardic Wonder's Armored Casting component

[Guest Gibson]

From https://github.com/Gibberlings3/Tweaks-Anthology/blob/0ad88a794ff2286ad0f0107a7ac737b7160e62b2/cdtweaks/lib/comp_2120.tpa#L12 , we have:
 

Quote

// eldritch knight is allowed to cast in armor, so artisan farms all of the 'disable cast button' op145s into an eff
// file (c0arcas2). The Eldritch Knight is then made immune via op318 to said eff, allowing them to cast. Working together
// Tweaks will now impose the normal miscast penalties, but keep the EK immune to them via an EFF system.

Artisan's Bardic Wonder's Armored Casting component does something similar, but is uses a different eff file (c0arcas1). This allows bards to cast in studded leather armor and below.

However, cdtweak's Allow Arcane Spellcasting in Armor component does not interact with the Armored Casting component in a way that results in the bard class's arcane casting being unhampered in studded leather armors and below. It appears that op60 is added onto ITMs even though they have an op177 with c0arcas1, resulting is bard class being hampered in studded leather armors and below.

[subtledoctor]

4 hours ago, Guest Gibson said:

Artisan's Bardic Wonder's Armored Casting

cdtweak's Allow Arcane Spellcasting in Armor component

Why would someone mix those components? Seems like a pretty obvious case of 'pick one armored casting mod or the other.'

[Guest Gibson]

14 minutes ago, subtledoctor said:

Why would someone mix those components? Seems like a pretty obvious case of 'pick one armored casting mod or the other.'

Because they do different things. It is only an obvious case of pick one if you are unfamiliar with the components.

One is specifically for bards. The other applies to any class e.g. think bucklers for mages. They are quite different in their intention. One allows bards to cast in specific armors without miscasting, and the other allows casting in most armors *with* miscasting.

Anyway, it can be fixed by adding an eff that adds miscasting, rather than adding op60 directly onto ITMs.