Jump to content

skellytz

Modders
  • Posts

    76
  • Joined

About skellytz

Recent Profile Visitors

4,455 profile views

skellytz's Achievements

  1. Let me quote the readme: First, Latin isn't exactly the language I want to hear in a D&D game. Second, the BG1 variants fit my image of a wizard practicing the arts of magic, which often means going through certain sacrifices, a mental toll, reaching darker corners of the mind, speaking to the whimsical powers of the universe, etc. I don't want to think about Julius Caesar, medieval scribes, legal terms or surgical operations when casting spells in BG. And tongue-in-cheek pop-cultural references like Hadouken match the overall tone of the game which always make me reminisce and smile. So, the BG1 weapon sounds are more varied and I'd say maybe more authentic that way. The BG2 armor sounds are comedic or cartoonish to me in comparison. Personally, I quickly grew tired of that rattle. As far as the spellcasting sound effects are concerned, I mostly prefer the BG1 variants. They match the spellcasting voices. I want consistency, so I went for BG1 spellcasting sounds for all the spells where the change makes sense.
  2. Yes, all the components. I've spent countless hours comparing the sounds and I simply prefer the BG1 variants. These questions should be for @Andrea C.
  3. The server owner is aware of the issues. We're sorry for the inconvenience. I'm sure @Sam. will sort out your account validation when he's available. Please check out the readme. The legacy version 5 doesn't support BGEE. Version 6 hasn't been released yet as stated clearly on the GitHub page.
  4. The readme in the GitHub repository represents a backup of Gwendolyne's existing (and unfinished) work on v6. It doesn't concern the legacy v5 at all (and is rather inaccurate). The correct readme for v5 is in the zip package and here: https://skellytz.github.io/docs/infinityanimations.html I'll repeat myself: the repacked v5 is not the promised new version of Infinity Animations; it's still the same old version with all the required content already included in one package for your convenience and registry code page checks/hacks removed (because they didn't work on newer Windows anyway). macOS doesn't support patching executable files, so IA installation will fail.
  5. What are your Windows language settings? Did you change the language for non-Unicode programs as instructed in the Infinity Animations readme?
  6. No, I don't. This is Andrea's project and his decision what to do about the reports.
  7. Install it after Infinity Sounds. Of course, Nostalgia Pack is awesome. These days I play only the classics, though.
  8. People, can you please stop saying that something is dead? "SHS is dead." "Infinity Animations is dead." It's just so demotivating. SHS staff has been trying to reach the respective authors behind the scenes. Is this not enough to realize I'm willing to resume work on the project when necessary? Please leave it up to the staff to decide when. Thanks!
  9. Starting with v1.21, BGT spawns in BG1 areas are the same as in the original BG1:TotSC. Due to the differences between BG1 and BG2 engines, the spawn points had to be adjusted to match the original behavior. Basically, a spawn point difficulty of 1 in BG1 equals a spawn point difficulty of 100 in BG2. (This doesn't apply to rest spawns; both games use the same calculations there.) BGT multiplies the spawn point difficulty value in all BG1 areas by 100 with the assumption that the engine will use the BG2 spawn point calculations. The spawn point difficulty is then used in this formula: No. spawns = (Spawn Difficulty * Avg. Party Lvl * Party Size) / Creature Power Lvl (rounded down) (Many spawn points have an additional limit of maximum spawned creatures, so you don't always get the exact results.) Which format does GemRB follow: spawn difficulty 1, 2, 3... (BG1) or spawn difficulty 100, 200, 300... (BG2)?
  10. I've also set up GitHub Discussions for comments, questions, and suggestions. You can track reports and fixes in Issues. Thank you. I need to add labels indicating which games are supported by each component because it may be confusing. Does Lefreut's UI override the existing GUI sounds? At a glance, it doesn't seem to contain any audio files, so it most likely uses the default ones and the mods are compatible. The most audible differences are: The so-called main area ambients use BG1 channel volume because they are mostly used in BG1 areas (BGT, EET). BG2 areas typically use looped ambients instead of main ambients in a different section of the area file, which have a separate channel. Spellcasting voices slightly attenuated to match the lower volume levels of post-casting sounds GUI sounds use BG1 volume A bit louder footsteps and armor walking sounds The author of that post exaggerated the town crier's sounds. In BG1, his selection sound is "Hear ye! Hear ye!" and his rare nine-click selection sound is "I'm actually quite shy!" His existence/idle sound slots are: "Hear ye! Hear ye!" (80%) and "I'm actually quite shy!" (20%). So, no, he doesn't have existence/idle sounds with "news about the region." Right clicking should produce the selection sound "Hear ye! Hear ye!" That's it. When actually talking to the crier, he'll mention Bassilus; react once you've completed the quest; and if your reputation is low, say that there's a bounty placed on your head.
  11. A new version can be found here: https://github.com/skellytz/infinity-animations/releases There was a problem with the filename encoding of Moinesse's Avatars, which caused crashes for some players. Thanks to Taimon's report, this issue has been fixed. Please remember this is an update of the legacy version of Infinity Animations for the adventurous who want to install mega modifications on the classic BG2. The work on version 6 will be resumed in the unfortunate event that Gwendolyne remains unreachable. Check the readme before installation. Make sure you fully understand this:
  12. RESPONSE #30 SelectWeaponAbility(SLOT_WEAPON1,0) AttackReevaluate(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),15) END This has a low chance of happening, but when it does, and as long as the nearest enemy keeps kiting, schnappi won't switch to ranged attacks. The first block with Range(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),5) will return false and the second one true, which for AttackReevaluate means continue the attack action. There would have to be additional blocks which, e.g., give it a chance to swap weapons if the bassie gets hit. But perhaps then we'd be going too far with tweaks. If more players are in favor, I could reduce the delay for basilisks, ankhegs, winter wolves, wyverns, ettercaps and wyverns, i.e., BG1 creatures that should swap weapons but feel too sluggish BG2 combat. On the other hand, it won't really affect the player's approach and the scripts will still feel lackluster. BGEE also doesn't change the delay. We have SCS for making combat more interesting, after all.
  13. They use their BG1 script and they do have a chance to use melee attacks. They even have a chance to go melee berserk when the target isn't in close range and they won't stop until they reach the target. IF See(NearestEnemyOf(Myself)) Range(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),5) Delay(12) !StateCheck(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),STATE_STONE_DEATH) THEN RESPONSE #30 SelectWeaponAbility(SLOT_WEAPON0,0) RunAwayFrom(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),45) AttackReevaluate(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),15) RESPONSE #70 SelectWeaponAbility(SLOT_WEAPON1,0) AttackReevaluate(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),15) END IF See(NearestEnemyOf(Myself)) Delay(12) !StateCheck(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),STATE_STONE_DEATH) THEN RESPONSE #70 SelectWeaponAbility(SLOT_WEAPON0,0) AttackReevaluate(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),15) RESPONSE #30 SelectWeaponAbility(SLOT_WEAPON1,0) AttackReevaluate(NearestEnemyOf(Myself),15) END The problem is the long Delay(12) which makes them very unresponsive. This delay is consistent with all BG1 creatures which were designed to swap weapons during combat: lesser basilisk greater basilisk ankheg ettercap wyvern winter wolf Reducing the delay to, e.g., six seconds makes reevaluation snappier. Would that be considered acceptable short of overhauling the script?
×
×
  • Create New...