Amaurea Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Have fun Eric! The best and most satisfying results are obtained through overpainting, but if you want to process a lot of images at once ... particularly images which will only ever be seen in the smallest size ... some kind of script will be a godsend. I agree that batch processing is out, since a lot of these filters will ask for input on variables as they go through the various steps. BUT ... 10 minutes or so per picture sure beats 3-5 hours (what it generally takes me to do one with all the overpainting, and that's thanks to the images being relatively small ... a larger image would take a lot longer). Link to comment
ericp07 Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Have fun Eric! The best and most satisfying results are obtained through overpainting, but if you want to process a lot of images at once ... particularly images which will only ever be seen in the smallest size ... some kind of script will be a godsend. I agree that batch processing is out, since a lot of these filters will ask for input on variables as they go through the various steps. BUT ... 10 minutes or so per picture sure beats 3-5 hours (what it generally takes me to do one with all the overpainting, and that's thanks to the images being relatively small ... a larger image would take a lot longer). Indeed So far, I've learned that, when it comes to overpainting, it's all about the layers! I predict that editing smallish images will be simpler in some ways, and more challenging in other ways, than editing a larger image. Of course, for someone of my experience, it's far easier to rely on filters and adjustments than to paint. Working with images has me wishing I had a Wacom tablet, or similar device, but I make do with my trackball mouse for now Happy editing, Eric Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.