darvin88 Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 how to compile GemRB without openal support? Win XP / Cygwin Link to comment
lynx Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 You could hack the configure file, but I'm not sure if an openal-less gemrb is really possible (openal may be tied to more than just the openal sound plugin). Link to comment
Avenger Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 No, it isn't tied in more places. The NullSound plugin is completely compatible with the OpenAl plugin. So, it would take over and GemRB would run flawlessly. (At least this was the case before). Link to comment
darvin88 Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 You could hack the configure file, but I'm not sure if an openal-less gemrb is really possible (openal may be tied to more than just the openal sound plugin). how to hack configure file? Link to comment
Avenger Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 remove all references to the openal plugin. That's probably just removing the gemrb/plugins/OpenALAudio/Makefile line from it. Link to comment
zefklop Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Is openAL compulsory to compile GemRB? That sounds quite paradoxical if there is a NullSound driver... Link to comment
Avenger Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Theoretically: no But the current compile scripts might fail. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.