agris Posted April 17, 2023 Posted April 17, 2023 I like how CHARNAME can petition the temple next to Beregost for their black pearl. Yet, when you return later with another one and offer to give it to the temple, it is not removed from inventory. This occurred when the party member who actually held the pearl - the one ostensibly given to the temple - is not actually inside the temple. They were outside the temple. The pearl was also in a gem bag. I don't know if the NPC's location / gem bag are relevant, but those were the specific conditions. Also cdtweak's "require identification for gems / pots" results in the black pearl that the temple hands you being unidentified - which doesn't make much sense. Quote
CamDawg Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 Well, it's because I never gave Keldath the action to actually take the black pearl from the party. Which is convenient, because I also never have him check if the party has the pearl to begin with. As for the identification issue, this is an easy fix for the EEs, and a bit of a workaround on the originals. As such I've just addressed it for the EEs as it's a bit of an edge case. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.