the bigg Posted March 15, 2006 Share Posted March 15, 2006 As the title says Anyway... suppose I decide to rush to Suldanessalar, talk to Demin, get Deheriana in party, and get back to playing the rest of SoA. Would you mind adding a full SoA portion to Deheriana for these players? (or, rather, enforce a timer to have K&D whine and leave if you play such a trick). Disregard this thread with insults if the situation I described is impossible and I should have played the mod through / read the code to check before posting Link to comment
Grand_Dracolich Posted March 15, 2006 Share Posted March 15, 2006 I'm pretty sure Deheriana leaves the party if you take too long to finish the game (I went and did a few minor quests after I got her, and she up and left in Hell). Link to comment
Domi Posted March 15, 2006 Share Posted March 15, 2006 Deheriana only dies, if you did not succeed to restore her. Otherwise, she gets a load of XP, and stays through ToB, playing as a regular NPC in ToB with a friendship sequence and all the frills. Basically the only content I have for Deheriana in SoA atm is Watcher's Keep, her reaction to Kivan-Tazok aftermath and banter with each NPCs that will occur either in SoA or ToB. I never really intended her as an SoA NPC, she is very much ToB oriented. The thing is, I could never gauge interest in her accurately, so I kept wondering if I will just waste my time developping her. If I get an overwhelming feedback telling me how people would love to have her as a more active participant in SoA, I will do more development. Say a couple of banters with each NPC, plus interjections in the sidequests, and a dozen or so talks with the PC. Link to comment
the bigg Posted March 15, 2006 Author Share Posted March 15, 2006 OK, coolies. This time around I'll swap her for Aerie in Suldanessalar, then However, count me as a person interested for some Deheriana-SoA content (if I ever played again with Kivan and Deheriana, that is). Since by when you get her you probably have done at least 1/2 of Amn + the whole chapter 3,4,5,6 specific content, then perhaps you can one-day her some additional 'standard' content - up to you, of course Link to comment
Domi Posted March 15, 2006 Share Posted March 15, 2006 The problem is that it will be difficult to determine which quests PC had done and which s/he left for "later on". So, basically, every quest in and around Amn will have to be Deherianaized, which the way I work means preparing a test game that had nothing done in it but the Guilds, and then played twice through - without and then with her content. Obviously, it helps that I don't have to worry about Brynnlaw, Spellhold, Underdark and Working for the Guilds parts, but everything else is a fair game, even things like Slavers and Sewers and Nalia's Castle that people *typically* do in Chapter 2. So, yep, it is a big addition. So, anyone else is interested in more Deheriana - SOA? Link to comment
the bigg Posted March 15, 2006 Author Share Posted March 15, 2006 You could just cheat and have Deheriana interject in most of the same places where Kivan does Since I'm playing them together, I have a strong suspicion that at least Sillara and nethrin pulled this one off while working on Saerileth and Yasraena let's not insult other modders' work Link to comment
Domi Posted March 15, 2006 Share Posted March 15, 2006 He-he, I do have a collection of D-files, and yes, they would help, but I sort of prefer to play and see where it is natural (or funny, or just plain interesting) for the character to speak up or speak with another NPC - which is something I want to do a lot more than I have done with Kivan - and what is going on in the scene to do interjections. I would also like to continue working in the interjections that include PC reactions, the way I did with Kiv. And, yes, I do have a reason to replay the BG2 again after a bit of a break anyways, but well, I'd rather not think that far ahead. For now, I am done with modding until I am back from my big vacations! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.