Do people really find CGI convincing?

[temnix]

As I'm practically evaporated from these boards, it doesn't get me anything to champion any views, but it's still not true that if CGI is "normal to them," it's normal as such. It will be fake even if no one recognizes that it's fake, just as the world could live without any painters who know natural forms, and still the shapes would remain as they would have been perceived by those with the eye to see. And what the young people lack to understand the difference is simply education. Knowing nothing except Photoshop is not an argument.

[hybridial]

On 12/12/2021 at 2:35 PM, Thacobell said:

I think my "favorite" thing about the movie industry right now, is that the difference between a "cartoon for kids" and a "serious live action film" is apparently a single real actor in a movie that is otherwise all cgi. 

And the writing in the kids cartoon has about a 50/50 chance at least of being more complex in its writing

[Thacobell]

50 minutes ago, hybridial said:

And the writing in the kids cartoon has about a 50/50 chance at least of being more complex in its writing

This, all the this.

[Jarno Mikkola]

Well, I can say that sometimes this is tricky. For example this video. Spoilers, nearly all "the office" shots have 4 passes.