Jump to content

PR: Refresh, non-stacking


Recommended Posts

I agree that the 206 deletion is too indiscriminate, but it could simply have more matching parameters. Don’t really need to clone-then-delete. (And, without more matching parameters, the cloning might be too indiscriminate as well, adding unnecessary 321 effects.) 

But this may get to the same result, so maybe not worth the effort of quibbling. 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...