Inconsistencies in CLSWPBON.2DA for the penalty when attacking without proficiency

[suy]

Some classes/kits get what to me seems a suspicious enough inconsistent penalty in the last colum. For example, this are the ones receiving a 5 penalty (should be only Wizard group, I think):

MAGE                0                   0                   5
MAGE_THIEF          0                   0                   5
ABJURER             0                   0                   5
CONJURER            0                   0                   5
DIVINER             0                   0                   5
ENCHANTER           0                   0                   5
ILLUSIONIST         0                   0                   5
INVOKER             0                   0                   5
NECROMANCER         0                   0                   5
TRANSMUTER          0                   0                   5
WILDMAGE            0                   0                   5
SORCERER            0                   0                   5
SHADOWDANCER        0                   0                   5
DRAGON_DISCIPLE     0                   0                   5

I think Mage/Thief should not be there, as it should get the best of the two classes, and neither should Shadowdancer, because other thieves have a 3 instead. The list receiving 2 or 3 penalty seems correct to me.

[CamDawg]

Agreed on this--every other multiclass uses the better non-proficiency penalty of the constituent classes, and all other kits use the same penalty as the parent class.

[CamDawg]

Fixed.