Jump to content

InThePineways

Members (r)
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by InThePineways

  1. @Jarno Mikkola He means an image of something that doesn't exist in real life. A camera obscura just projects light from an object into a dark room, it doesn't generate fantasy images of things that don't exist. Before CGI, film also relied on props and drawings to create an illusion of something unreal. His point stands: Before digital tech, to create an image of something truly unreal you would have to draw it.

     

  2. The story of the last man, not quite as predicted by Nietzsche. He sits alone, musing over myth and philosophy from his rich heritage, gifts from the giants of the past. Surrounded by sophisticated technology, he is preoccupied watching an insect struggle across the floor. No battles to fight, no forests to tame, just a man idly watching as the tiny fragment of nature invading his insular home slowly dies, killed by an automated process. His powerful mind is under stimulated. He looks forward to the quiet amusement of tinkering with his video game, a sedentary hobby after working a sedentary job. The last man has no need for sons - in his old age he'll be cared for by social programs constructed by previous generations. Surrounded by people, yet without any real sense of community, he's atomized, a product of his time.

  3. In vanilla BG and BG EE, there's a small easter egg I'm sure you all know about. If you right click a companion more than 9 times, you'll hear 3 'rare' responses per character. For some reason, with EET installed, the rare responses never come up, just an endless cycle of their regular responses.

    It's not exactly a game ruining bug, but still unfortunate and worth mentioning. I wonder what causes it, and whether it can be fixed?

  4. @subtledoctor That's closer to what I meant. A spiritual autism, an autism of the soul. I have no doubt most of g3 can say the same.

    +1 int for subtledoctor, now at 7 points

  5. 6 hours ago, subtledoctor said:

    Did you seriously start a whole thread just to flame me?

    ❤️

    2 hours ago, Graion Dilach said:

    There actually was one. The dot topic in SCS was actually legit as a duplicate of https://www.reddit.com/r/baldursgate/comments/v5tr9v/even_better_calls_for_help/ , but by the time he opened it here, I already answered that on Reddit. TBH, if you skim his Reddit comment history, there's a high chance you figure out his problem.

    What problem? Autism? That should be obvious.

  6. On 5/20/2022 at 10:07 AM, CamDawg said:

    Edited to clarify: we don't moderate posts based on content at G3; we leave it up to our members to form their own opinions about other users so having a clear post history (as best we can make it) furthers that goal. Many users, when they make an especially egregious and dumb remark, will realize their error and edit it to something more reasonable and/or less embarrassing. While in this case it would require a level of self-reflection that's yet to be evidenced, I felt compelled to preserve this particular bit just in case.

    I'm glad you included this, CamDawg. I almost started clutching my pearls, wringing my hands, and so on.

  7. 2 hours ago, The_Baffled_King said:

    I'm dealing with the rest tersely

    Write in whatever manner you like. If an internet forum conversation stops being fun, there's no reason to continue it.

    2 hours ago, The_Baffled_King said:

    Phew. I feel like I've just sat a test

    It sounds like you stopped having fun.

    2 hours ago, The_Baffled_King said:

    Films tend to conform to the male gaze

     
    MPAA Report 2018: Women Represent 51% of Moviegoers, 47% of Ticket Buyers. Your statement might be true of action movies, however. Since Avengers and Black Widow are both action movies, let's pretend that's what you said. Your statement stands. 
     
    Some of the moves in your clip from the Avengers film would require more strength than Scarlett Johansson looks capable of (wrist grab in the first few seconds), but there's a deeper current of realism in movies that makes this a moot point.
     
    The crux of it is this: Are female characters in modern movies believable? Are they in any way grounded in reality (fiction's relation to reality is what gives it meaning)? We both agreed that Ellen Ripley from Alien was a well written female lead in an action movie. We disagree about Black Widow. What is different about these characters? Well, a lot, but in particular it's the archetype (i.e. a recurrent symbol or motif in literature, art, or mythology) they embody.
    In Alien, the setting and circumstances are pure fiction, but there is a deeper truth to Ellen's ordeal that is older than time. She's a woman protecting herself and a child (remember the little girl she finds) from a predator. This is a reality stretching back to our pre-human ancestors, and I believe that's why this movie speaks to me. It appeals to a primordial truth.
    In Black Widow, we have a badass warrior, a killer, a fighter for justice, etc.... a male role, but with the genders swapped. This isn't a reality ever experienced by human kind, except maybe in a handful of examples from modern times of female soldiers and snipers which were made possible by modern weaponry. I believe that's why Black Widow fails to kindle anything in me, and why this type of character is controversial (how many people talk trash about marvel movies?).
     
     
×
×
  • Create New...