subtledoctor Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 From the RC12 documentation. Why isn't that sort of thing done in IWD-in-EET? No need for it in EET proper. Unless you are planning to bundle up EET and IWD-in-EET (and, implicitly, IWD2-in-EET) as one single project? Is that the plan? (And does that mean future versions of EET are going to require EEex?) Quote Link to comment
Jarno Mikkola Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 (edited) Or one could ... put this into the BG2EE. With a first, an official (G3) BG2 fixpack ... Ouh, we forgot the 33, so (G3) BG2EE Fixpack. Edited May 30, 2019 by Jarno Mikkola Quote Link to comment
K4thos Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 (edited) mostly due to laziness. Doing it in EET is a matter of adding 1 line to conversion library which automatically handles every single instance of these spell references in all kind of resources, regardless of what Beamdog decides to change via patches in future. Since those 2 innate spells are BG1 only and specific enough to be extremely unlikely to be referenced via symbolic name in mods installed after EET, I've chosen this approach. Does it conflict with your mod? Ideally it would be great if Beamdog would clean BG1 innate junk from level 9 spell range via patch. edit: of course EET won't be bundled with IWD-in-EET. Edited May 30, 2019 by K4thos Quote Link to comment
Sam. Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 39 minutes ago, K4thos said: edit: of course EET won't be bundled with IWD-in-EET. Why not? Quote Link to comment
subtledoctor Posted May 31, 2019 Author Share Posted May 31, 2019 11 hours ago, K4thos said: Since those 2 innate spells are BG1 only and specific enough to be extremely unlikely to be referenced via symbolic name in mods installed after EET, I've chosen this approach. Does it conflict with your mod? Nope. Just curious. 11 hours ago, K4thos said: Ideally it would be great if Beamdog would clean BG1 innate junk from level 9 spell range via patch. Agreed. But I wouldn't hold my breath... 11 hours ago, K4thos said: edit: of course EET won't be bundled with IWD-in-EET. Ah, got it. Didn't know what your plans are with that. Quote Link to comment
Jarno Mikkola Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 13 hours ago, Sam. said: Why not? Space, the final frontier. As in, byte space. And I would think that updating one project files doesn't need to be tied to the other. But that's just a given, man. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.