Skills and Abilities Mod

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[Dan_P]

Just my quick take. The changes look pretty good overall so far. Large swords could probably be split up, maybe to straight swords and curved/single-edged swords. It seems a bit too much for one weapon group. The other groups  look fine. Staff doesn't really fit in with the other blunt weapons, but by itself, it's weak as a proficiency. Maybe something could be done with it that makes it worth a slot for mages/sorcerers? In the unmodded game, there's no reason for a mage to ever take staff except with their final proficiency. Kind of an odd situation considering so many magical staves are meant for casters.

Are you planning to nerf/change some of the HLAs (or even remove them)? Fighters seem like they could get pretty overpowered with Critical Striker on top of the usual Critical Strike + Improved Haste + dual wield. With the new proficiencies, could basically require SCS with full enemy prebuffing for any challenge in the later parts of BG2/ToB. One thing that could be done with dual wielding is give a damage penalty to the offhand. Reddbane does this with his 3.5e weapon style rebalance (which is what I currently use).

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[Dan_P]

Okay, that's more interesting actually, knowing that enemies get new proficiencies, beyond just the weapons. And you're probably right about critical strike. I haven't, obviously, played that far with this mod to know the balance with it.

With the proficiency suggestions, I was mainly throwing that out, to see how open you were to suggestions (since you called this an alpha), but it seems like you have a clear idea already of what you want to do with it.

Beyond that, I was more thinking about balance. BG1 proficiencies work because you only have basic-ass weapons for most of the game, and no weapon styles. It doesn't make a huge difference what proficiency you choose (and I recently played through BG1 in BG1 engine to test my script for the game). BG2, however, wasn't balanced with these larger weapon groups in mind. It also added katanas, which weren't in BG1 to begin with, so technically were never part of the Large Sword category.

So with large swords, for example, very early game, you have a speed weapon, you have celestial fury and daystar. You can switch to Lilarcor if you need Confusion immunity, etc. In IWDEE, long sword, bastard sword, and scimitar all have speed weapons (and most weapon types have none). In classic IWD, there's no dual wielding (same with BG1), and Bastard Sword and Two Handed Sword are split into their own weapon category, which somewhat balances this.

So bascially, I'm not telling you what you should do. I think this mod looks interesting. But I thought I'd point this out, just as something to think about.

Edited January 30, 2022 by Dan_P

[Fishmalk]

For monks, what about giving them innate crit immunity? Being a melee fighter unable to wear a helmet is painful.

For the Armor proficiency, I don't like the speed factor penalty for 0 pips, and the first pip doing nothing but removing that. One speed factor is the worst return for a proficiency point in the game, save for possibly the routinely skipped third point in two weapon fighting. Compare this with the Devotion and Spellcraft proficiencies which give actual benefits at the first point.

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[Endarire]

What about a plain speed factor bonus for armor proficiency 1 with no penalty otherwise?  I too dislike the penalty.

[subtledoctor]

I think the idea is, any joker off the street can’t just put on a set of plate mail and expect to fight and move in as well as they normally do. You need to train - spend proficiency points - in order to get the full benefit. In 3E they introduced the idea of being proficient in light armor or heavy armor. 

I like the idea of being penalized if you don’t spend the proficiency point. Maybe something like a constellation of small penalties, like -1 to weapon speed, -1 to thac0, and -5% damage resistance? Each effect is very small, barely noticeable... but in the aggregate it makes it worth becoming proficient. 

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[guyudennis]

Ideas (3e) you might want to consider, if they are even possible in the first place:

* make detect traps/illusions, hide in shadows and tracking not disabling each other; make them slow your movement rate instead. The slowing effects are cumulative with each other, meaning if you want to both hide and detect, you move even slower than when you perform only one of them

* you can now give elves keen senses and they suffer less movement rate penalties when detecting/hiding/tracking

* give rangers swift tracker and hide in plain sight abilities and make them useable only in natural terrains. This shall offset the limitations that they can only hide/detect in natural terrains. At the moment, without these skills, it’s pure nerf for rangers

[subtledoctor]

True, but the time spent at level 1 is quite short. For the large portion of the trilogy, thac0 is more or less meaningless for warriors. There are soooo many options to boost it (stats, specialization, styles, magic weapons, buff spells) and almost nothing to counterbalance those bonuses. A 1-point penalty is of course not desirable, but it will never actually hold you back.

Anyway any fighter should spend the point in heavy armor proficiency. Also, relatedly, IMHO fighters should have more proficiency points to spend overall.

Clerics have to be more parsimonious with their proficiency points, and the thac0 hit would have greater impact for them. But that also means the choice of whether to spend the point there becomes a meaningful choice - which is a good thing in RPGs. Do you want your cleric to tank? Then invest in armor proficiency. Would you prefer more advanced spellcasting skills? Find some good-quality studded leather.

(I am realizing that in my mind, I am conceiving this as a heavy armor proficiency - light armors should probably require no such investment.)

4 minutes ago, guyudennis said:

give rangers ... hide in plain sight

IIRC that is hard-coded to only work for the Shadowdancer kit. (Unless perhaps EEex can do something about that?)

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562

[Endarire]

Agreed.  Heavy armor is more viable in BG than 3.x due to it being an overall benefit instead of an AC cap.

[Guest morpheus562]

Remove

Edited May 17 by morpheus562