Request: Refinements-style spellcasting

[Bursk]

I was wondering if it would be possible to add a component that offers reduced penalties for the above activities when using +1, +2 etc types of armour. So whereas studded leather would still give you a 30% penalty to pick pocket, +1 studded leather would give you e.g. a 25% penalty.

 

I know this may be a bit unrealistic, but I do like the idea of better armour reducing your penalties. I'd also like to see a similar thing happen with the miscast penalites.

 

Is there any chance that such a component would be considered for the future?

[the bigg]

(at this point, why not using the one in Refinements?)

[Bursk]

Because I'm not 100% keen on the whole Refs armour package. I know you told me before how to remove the armour-induced slowdown, but I realised what a big job it would be to remove the slowdown from every armour and shield in the game.

[CamDawg]

Because I'm not 100% keen on the whole Refs armour package.  I know you told me before how to remove the armour-induced slowdown, but I realised what a big job it would be to remove the slowdown from every armour and shield in the game.

Sure, easily done. Down penalties 5% for each enchantment level, yes?

 

edit: Crap, except descriptions need to be updated as well.

[the bigg]

(it'd be probably easier if I added such an option to the Refinements one instead, but if you want to have this in G3T this go for it.)

[Bursk]

Well, I hate to sound ungrateful and don't wish to create any extra work for someone, but I thought that maybe this could be done easily enough so it wouldn't hurt to ask.

[CamDawg]

(it'd be probably easier if I added such an option to the Refinements one instead, but if you want to have this in G3T this go for it.)

Go for it. You know I have enough Tweak work ahead of me...

[Bursk]

TBH, I think I'd rather see a version of Refinements with the movement penalty removed, rather than an addition to G3 Tweaks. The only thing I dislike about the armour component in Refs is the slowdown, so if that could be made optional it'd be just perfect. I wouldn't even care if the descriptions were wrong, since it'd be easy enough to completely ignore the entry about movement penalties.

 

Cam, if you get a chance, could you please take a look at the Barb HP problem I've been having?

 

http://forums.gibberlings3.net/index.php?showtopic=5734

 

Thanks.

[SimDing0]

While you're at it, implement the reformatting of the Refinements armour description updates that I proposed.

[Bursk]

While you're at it, implement the reformatting of the Refinements armour description updates that I proposed.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Hee, I was going to request that, but I feel that I bother poor Bigg enough as it is.

[the bigg]

While you're at it, implement the reformatting of the Refinements armour description updates that I proposed.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Hee, I was going to request that, but I feel that I bother poor Bigg enough as it is.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You don't know the power of sed if you think that'll be difficult

[CamDawg]

Cam, if you get a chance, could you please take a look at the Barb HP problem I've been having?

 

http://forums.gibberlings3.net/index.php?showtopic=5734

 

Thanks.

I'm not ignoring you, I promise. I thought this had been addressed in the last version, but I'll take another look.