jastey Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 AerieRomanceActive setting to 1 for any PC of any race is not Romance Encounters-specific, so I don't see any point. It's a glitch in the original game we will not be correcting. But I'll see if adding AerieMatch=1 variable fixes the issue on our end. Or "Gender(Player1,MALE)", for example. Link to comment
Kulyok Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 Gender(Player1,MALE) may not be as good, since there're multiromancing scripts, Mirrabo's Imoen and possibly other stuff(including the_bigg's experiments, but let's not go there) which make Aerie flirt with/romance the female PC. Link to comment
Kulyok Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 On the other hand, having read about berelinde's issues with vanilla game(sorry - I haven't noticed the post right away), I guess expanding jastey's suggestion and adding a gender check for Chanelle for all three girls is better. If another mod makes Aerie romance with the female NPC real, they'll likely write their own reaction, and accounting for roleplaying value of multiromance scripts is rather silly of me. Link to comment
KIrving Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 This isn't a Chanelle thing it's actually a Solaufein thing but it encounters the same Aerie Romance Active situation so I thought it would be best to put it here. After the Solaufein encounter with my female PC, I got Aerie's interjection instead of Anomen's. Anomen's response did not come up at all. Just to see Anomen's reaction, I killed Aerie before the encounter, saw his response about Sola (I really hope the poor boy isn't counting or good at math.) and then resurrected Aerie.(Solved my problem but might be a tad extreme. ) Link to comment
jastey Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Oops, thank you for reporting. (And that counting thing will get better once berelinde wrote the "cumulative romance reaction component" Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.