Jump to content

AWizardDidIt

Members
  • Content Count

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About AWizardDidIt

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,561 profile views
  1. Also fair Although in this case I think the way I wrote the transition for Kathos was a sort of spell to relive the events of IWD rather than literal time travel. I'm not sure if that's still the case since I've not been involved in this project for a while but I thought it was an elegant way to handle it that avoided most of the pitfalls of time travel in fiction.
  2. While IWD is itself removed enough from BG that IWD-in-EET could easily just change a few names and handwave that it's set contemporaneously as BG, IWD2's plot is too interwoven with the events of the first game set several decades later for the mod to do the same with both. My preference has always been to have the plot of IWD1 be a time travel scenario while IWD2 is set during the events of BG. It makes the most sense with the least amount of rewrites needed.
  3. Oh what a great idea! Glad to see some EET specific quest mods in the works.
  4. AWizardDidIt

    Progress

    I check in on this board every few weeks and am also still excited for it to be a reality
  5. AWizardDidIt

    Progress

    Just speaking for myself but when I wrote for this I did it out of a sense of love for the game and not for any expectation of payment. I'm kind of with Kathos on this, it would be weird to accept donations at this point. I cant imagine a few dollars is going to move the project along any faster anyway.
  6. AWizardDidIt

    Progress

    I am also happy to see that this is continued to be worked on
  7. AWizardDidIt

    Progress

    I'm glad to see how things are moving and it's good to see you back K4thos Shoot me a message once the beta for IWD2 is in any kind of playable state. I might be interested in writing more dialogue interactions for party characters if you still think that would be a good addition.
  8. Edit: after further thought, I think I'll just keep my comments to myself. Best to just acknowledge this and move on.
  9. Ah, I didn't know about the other Sarevok mods. One less thing for you to worry about then.
  10. Tamoko is a character who has a really strong conceit that personally resonates with me but she's so barely sketched beyond it it gives you a lot of freedom. I of course always would encourage you exercise creative freedom to do whatever else you want with her because there's going to be just about nothing in the game to contradict you. The Yoshimo-sister angle could be interesting but it also doesn't really add anything to her character so since it sounds like you consider that non-canon, I think ignoring it is perfectly fine. I'm glad for that. I think it also makes sense to add in a conversation with Sarevok in ToB where you reveal what happened to Tamoko and have that reflect on Sarevok in some way. Maybe a conversation earlier on while he's still Chaotic Evil where he dismisses that connection but if you alignment change him later on he admits guilt and a sense of responsibility over it and possible realization that she was the only person who showed actual true love towards him in his life and that was part of the reason he pushed her away. (just an idea anyway )
  11. Just wanted to post to say I'm continually amazed by the work you put into EET and modding Roxanne. I'll probably be starting a new playthrough in the next month or so. I'll give this a try then.
  12. I've always wanted Tamoko to be expanded upon and her death to be resolved even if you spared her at the end of BG1. Yoshimo was supposed to be a relative of hers iirc? I remember hearing that though it's not made explicit anywhere.
×
×
  • Create New...