Jump to content

lynx

Modders
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,900

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Mods

News

Store

Everything posted by lynx

  1. lynx
    Did anyone test if this affects the enchantment level and weapon speed as well?
  2. lynx

    Windows builds are back!

    lynx replied to lynx's topic in GemRB

    What makes you think it's a 64-bit build? oO
  3. lynx

    Main window is broken

    lynx replied to Theodor's topic in DLTCEP

    I don't remember DLTCEP ever being resizable, but I probably don't have the latest version either.
  4. lynx
    since I was on the right branch, here's a quick video display/explanation: 10pp mod doesn't do any prohibitive game checks. It's needed to fix the scripts, dialogs and let the engine know about the new objects. GemRB doesn't care about party count, but tries to improve the gui if it's higher than 6. Just not in PST or IWD2, since their lack of space due to being horizontal was too annoying.
  5. lynx
    The mod does support pst, it's just useless there since nobody bothered with the gui yet. If one doesn't mind using a hotkey to reverse party order all the time, there's no problem, besides looking ugly.
  6. lynx
    Are you the same guy from youtube? It's possible with GemRB and the 10pp mod, while the EE guys previously (of BG) said it doesn't fit their vision. No go.
  7. lynx
    True, but you lose the overview. Granted, at 40 even 5 columns would look unwieldy. And six times slower level progression with barely equipped npcs. It'd be quite a challenge to survive.
  8. lynx
    Mod sites?
  9. lynx
    You don't want 40 party members, trust me. Even playing with 8 shows more micromanagement is needed and it wouldn't scale to 40 at all. More importantly, there's not enough space to display that many player portraits in most windows that have them and even the game window would need a resolution height of at least 4-5k pixels. Just not displaying them could cause all sorts of other problems. The other option you mention sounds easier, but isn't, as far as I know. You'd have to further mod the mods first for the entourage to follow you around, not get stuck and initiate dialogs now and then. When it happened, you'd be overwhelmed with dialogs. Many combats would likely result in some of them dying and/or getting hostile ... So let it go. You want to play a game, not spend months hacking on mods or gemrb.
  10. lynx
    "Release early and release often."
  11. lynx
    OP, please don't answer that, you made your view clear in the original thread. No reason to spawn another tirade.
  12. lynx
    the extensions for the two lua ones are .lua? wbm sounds awefully like webm. Cool. .ba sounds like something dropped during development.
  13. lynx
    That's what docs are for, of course banging your head against the code directly is harder.
  14. lynx
    That's why it's great that it is under version control — any malice is easy to detect and revert. There's plenty of information on how to contribute to BWS; how do you think Roxanne, jastey or me started?
  15. lynx
    subtledoctor: do you see the difference with the first post? There you said you tried *everything*, but now it's clearer that you just don't want to contribute. And you seem to rather keep projecting that Roxanne is incapable of a sensible discussion. :s "anything but civil"
  16. lynx
    I don't understand what "contribute to BWS" means. I can't clone the BitBucket repo to my GitHub app, for whatever reason, so I can't make a pull request that way. And the BitBucket page for BWS has a big honking warning that says "DO NOT USE THE WEB INTERFACE TO MAKE CHANGES." So I'm at a bit of loss as to what I can do on my end. Your excuse is that a phillips screwdriver can't drive a flat head screw and it therefore can't be screwed? C'mon, stop with the trolling, intentional or not.
  17. lynx
    I was able to contribute to BWS without being able to test, so that's a pretty silly excuse. And no, the changes did not go in without testing. Anyway, has the configuration problem been found yet? All this angry ink spilled and the underlying problem doesn't appear to be clear at all.
  18. lynx
    Ah, all makes sense now.
  19. lynx
    Interesting, do you have spaces in your HOME path? btw, the existance check is not needed (that's what the -f is for).
  20. lynx
    I'll add #2 on our idea list. But I agree, it needs some tweaking, maybe taking only half of the speed into account.
  21. lynx
    AFAIK it checks for max current hp.
  22. lynx
    or just open the file and replace its contents with the one from here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gibberlings3/Tweaks-Anthology/master/cdtweaks/setup-cdtweaks.tp2 (if you can't just download it)
  23. lynx
    Yeah, the table got copied from gemrb which had the values from the exe.
  24. lynx
    It's the same with the fourth-wall breaking party in Abazigal's lair. DnD rules agree: https://open5e.com/gameplay-mechanics/conditions.html#srd-petrified http://www.d20srd.org/srd/conditionSummary.htm#petrified didn't bother with adnd.
  25. lynx
    binary diffing is an option, but someone would still have to sieve through it and group it to make it manageable/readable. No easy way out of this.
×
×
  • Create New...