Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Since Roxanne is apparently not going to come back to this thread, maybe something should be done to the opening post to make people coming in aware of that?

There is a link to her homepage in the opening post but still, this IS a support topic and it being here on the EET forum, it makes sense that people would expect to get answers and be heard?

Link to comment

... it makes sense that people would expect to get answers and be heard?

Silence can be an answer. Just because the forest doesn't have humans in it doesn't mean that your screams of agony go unheard.

If you would bother to read the above post. If you notice, it already assumes to not get a direct answer, as there's an thanks already. Just letting you know, that there can be an answer without words.

Link to comment

It's entirely unreasonable to assume people aren't expecting answers. These people don't know that Roxanne has fled to the hinterlands of the internet; they are posting issues hoping for support. Support which is not forthcoming.

 

Just close the thread. Roxanne is providing support on her own website, people would be better served looking for help there.

Link to comment

 

If you would bother to read the above post. If you notice, it already assumes to not get a direct answer, as there's an thanks already.

 

Seems to me, with each passing day, you stray further from logic and reason.

 

Just close the thread. Roxanne is providing support on her own website, people would be better served looking for help there.

I agree, that would probably be the best course of action.

Link to comment

Roxanne is still welcome as Roxanne to G3. She is not banned or anything.

I know and I didn't mean to imply that she should be or anything.

 

We'll just be diligent about letting newcomers to the thread know that they may find faster help at the support link in the OP rather than here.

 

Right, which was the point of my initial post. The opening post really doesn't convey that an answer from Roxanne can not be expected any time soon. Thus, a disclaimer of some sort might be warranted.

Edited by Ulb
Link to comment

Hi, i dont know where to ask, so I try it here. Im using this tool to install EET, but in stratagems installation i got this error:

 

ERROR: Failure("resource [sPWI435Z.SPL] not found for 'COPY'")

How can I fix this since this spell is not even present and I cant find that anywhere? I also attach both weidu logs. Thanks for helping me :)

 

//note: I also received error that IWD spells from stratagems was not installed due to similar component already installed from IWDfication

WeiDU.log

WeiDU-BGEE.log

Edited by konva
Link to comment

You might try the SCSs sub form here on the board or you might try Roxanne's personal forum (there is a link in the first post).

 

Have you recently updated to 2.5 via GoG? I've heard the patch over there is actually missing some files. In that cae, doing a complete re-install (with the full installers instead of the update patches) might solve your problem.

Link to comment

Hi, i dont know where to ask, so I try it here. Im using this tool to install EET, but in stratagems installation i got this error:

 

ERROR: Failure("resource [sPWI435Z.SPL] not found for 'COPY'")

How can I fix this since this spell is not even present and I cant find that anywhere? I also attach both weidu logs. Thanks for helping me :)

 

//note: I also received error that IWD spells from stratagems was not installed due to similar component already installed from IWDfication

SCS just recently got updated and the setup tool uses the new Release Candidate version to help with testing. Part of the update is that SCS now has its own component to add IWD arcane and divine spells into the game, so you should not use both SCS and IWDification components that add spells. If you want to use IWDification still, you should remove the components that add spells into the game (although last time I did this it wanted me to remove the IWDification mod altogether before continuing in the tool).

 

Honestly it's probably a good idea to just wait for a few weeks while bugs get ironed out in the new SCS unless you want to help with testing, or skip that mod entirely if you want to start a relatively bug-free play through right now. As someone said earlier, the SCS sub form is a better place to report your issue so it can get fixed.

Edited by KronoKinesis
Link to comment

Honestly it's probably a good idea to just wait for a few weeks while bugs get ironed out in the new SCS unless you want to help with testing, or skip that mod entirely if you want to start a relatively bug-free play through right now. As someone said earlier, the SCS sub form is a better place to report your issue so it can get fixed.

This. The whole point of doing a release candidate is to iron out bugs. It is extremely foolish for anyone to build a tool that auto-includes unstable release candidates; I don’t know how that ever seemed a good idea. Use SCS v31 if you want a stable install, or else wait for a full v32 release, probably in a week or two.

Link to comment

Roxanne does that for just about everything. It's easy to navigate for the most part and it's one of the reasons I enjoy using the tool. I prefer to have the install tool use the newer version even if it is a release candidate so that I can find what it working for the install that I want. I know that isn't always what people like, but it's preferred for me.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...